Skip to content

The $16 Million Elephant in the Room

reposted from

Last month, the Washington Times editorial board published a piece, “The inhumane society,” detailing the dishonesty of HSUS—epitomized, the paper argued, by the group’s contributions to a 14-year smear campaign (coordinated by HSUS and other animal-rights radicals) to ban elephants from the circus. Those who follow our efforts know how this movie ended: Ultimately, a federal court uncovered a scheme in which activists paid a key witness—who lied under oath—almost $200,000. The judge called this witness “essentially a paid plaintiff and fact witness who is not credible” and deemed an animal-rights lawsuit against the circus “frivolous and vexatious.”

As a result, Feld Entertainment, which owns Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey, brought a federal racketeering lawsuit against activists, resulting in HSUS and the other animal extremists writing a $15.75 million check that covered Ringling’s legal fees, wreaked by the prolonged crusade. (ASPCA, another organization named in the suit had already settled its part for $9.3 million.)

HSUS seems to think that animal lovers shouldn’t be phased by its settlement. In a letter responding to the Times’ editorial, HSUS spokesman Alan Heymann explained that the lawsuit was “settle[d] earlier this year,” and that the group “continues to be transparent about where donor dollars go.”

This insistence on transparency is surprising, given HSUS’s statement following the settlement. HSUS claimed that “no donor dollars from The HSUS will go to Feld.” That seems to be misleading at best, and perhaps outright false. HSUS’s insurance company denied it coverage regarding the RICO suit. HSUS has sued its insurer to try to get coverage, but there’s no guarantee HSUS will win—and the RICO lawsuit settlement was already paid in May.

Our polling also contradicts HSUS’s claims of ongoing “transparency and good stewardship of donations.” Last year, over 1,000 self-identified donors to the Humane Society of the United States reported that they supported the group “to help HSUS care for animals in shelters.” Upon learning that only 1% of the HSUS budget is used for this end, 84% of HSUS’s benefactors agreed “HSUS misleads people into thinking that it supports local humane societies and pet shelters.” That doesn’t exactly sound like transparency and good stewardship.

If you don’t take our word for it (or the words of the group’s very own donors), consider the evaluations of objective third-parties: Charity Navigator pulled HSUS’s rating and replaced it with a warning to donors. And the charity evaluator CharityWatch routinely gives HSUS bad grades on its report cards.

This isn’t Heymann’s first flop, either. Last year we told Bloomberg News about a complaint we filed with the IRS due to HSUS’s apparently filing of incorrect tax returns for years. HSUS had been wrongly inflating its finances against IRS instruction. Heymann’s brainless response in the story was “The only thing I would ask is that you consider the source of these allegations.” Well, Bloomberg did consider the source—and the facts—and ran the story. And in its most current tax return HSUS has changed the way it reports some of its income—presumably as a response to our allegations.

HSUS claims the Times is issuing “ad-hominem, false attacks” at the allegedly “respected” HSUS. But the facts speak for themselves, and a group that trades on the generosity of others to attack farmers or pay legal bills doesn’t earn any respect in our book.

More Stories

  • Latest Issue 10 21 19

    Read More
  • TWHBEA announces 2019 election results for 2020-2022 term

    TWHBEA announced the 2019 election results for the 2020-2022 term. See below the 2019 winners and runners up for the International Board of Directors. The term is to be served Dec 1, 2019–Nov. 30, 2022... Read More
  • Unanimous champions to receive some extra bling

    Everyone within the horse industry knows what it means when a horse and rider are called out of the line up as the “unanimous champions.” Indicative of an across-the-board first place win, a unanimous winner has received the winning nod of not just one judge, but the entire three- or perhaps even five-judge panel. Read More
  • NAS hosts information session about inspection study

    The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NAS) hosted its first meeting Wednesday Oct. 16 to unveil details regarding its upcoming study to review the methods for detecting soreness in horses... Read More
  • Latest Issue 10 14 19

    Read More
  • NAS to host first meeting

    The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NAS) will host the first meeting of the study to review the methods for detecting soreness in horses on October 16, 2019. A portion of the meeting will be open to the public beginning at 11:00 AM ET with a welcome from Committee Chair, Dr. Jerry Black... Read More
  • Celebration attendance among students way up

    The Celebration has been giving thousands of horse show tickets to the students for the past several years, but this year the Celebration Board took a different approach in an attempt to reach the masses and it worked... Read More
  • Equine Obituary – She's Push In Command

    She’s Push in Command was humanly euthanized in the early hours of Saturday, October 6, 2019, due to a chronic stifle injury. Known as Harley (or Big Momma) to those who loved her, she was bred and raised by Johnnie and Harriet Abrams of Waco, Kentucky. Harley was purchased as a yearling in 2003 by CM, Connie, and Lindsay Hess of Harrisonburg, Virginia.  Read More
  • NCWHA TIP Show canceled

    The NCWHA TIP Show, scheduled for Saturday, November 9, in Dallas, North Carolina has been cancelled. Read More
  • Baileyton Fall Classic updates class schedule

    The Baileyton Fall Classic, scheduled for Oct. 12, has added the following classes to their schedule...

    Read More