Skip to content

Will Horse Protection Changes Come Before Inauguration Day?



reposted from AmericanFarriers.com

The public comment period for the proposed amendments to the Horse Protection Act has come and gone. All parties within the horse industry have had a chance to let their voices be heard.

Now, the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has the unenviable task of sorting through thousands upon thousands of comments and determine which recommendations have merit. Transcripts from the five public meetings, as well as submitted comments are available online. While the vast majority rightfully applauds the intent to end soring, there is a great deal of thoughtful insight and recommendations for change that APHIS seriously should consider.

Much of the dissention focuses on two important areas — the broad language contained within the plan, as well as the proposed ban on “the use of all action devices, pads, and foreign substances at horse shows, exhibitions, sales, and auctions.” APHIS contends “this would align the HPA regulations with existing equestrian standards set forth by the U.S. Equestrian Federation (USEF).” 

Yet, according to its comments at the Sept. 6 public meeting in Riverdale, Md., USEF doesn’t seem to agree.

“We believe that unless the proposed language is amended, the enforceability of the regulation is vulnerable to a court finding that the proposed rule is arbitrary and capricious,” said Stephen Schumacher, a veterinarian and the chief administrator of USEF’s Drugs and Medications Program.

USEF and others in the equine industry — including the American Farrier’s Association and the American and International Associations of Professional Farriers — particularly are concerned with the statement “Tennessee Walking Horses, Racking Horses, or related breeds that perform with an accentuated gait that raises concerns about soring at any horse show, horse exhibition, horse sale, or horse auction.”

“This term is ambiguous at best and risks severe unintended consequences in interpretation,” Schumacher said. “The rules in the proposed regulation simply don’t make sense for many breeds and disciplines where soring doesn’t exist. Our solution is simple. We propose that the breeds competing in USEF licensed/endorsed competitions be exempt from this regulation and the responsibility for preventing soring be delegated to the USEF as is the current practice.”

The ambiguity drew a strong response from the American Horse Council, which called the provision “poorly constructed.”

“There are several horse breeds besides Tennessee Walking Horses, Racking Horses, and Spotted Saddle Horses that could be said to have an ‘accentuated gait,’ such as Saddlebreds, Morgans, Hackneys, and others,” according to the letter attributed to Julie Broadway, president of the AHC. “These breeds have never been cited for violations of the HPA and do not perform the ‘big lick’ that is the primary motivation for soring. … [B]ecause the term ‘raises concerns about soring,’ is subjective and undefined, it is unclear whether or not these new provisions of the rule might be extended to such breeds now or in the future.”

Some within the horse industry, including farriers, don’t believe that these concerns have merit. The government wouldn’t go to these extremes, they say. However, it cannot be assumed that those outside the industry correctly understand the terminology.

In an email exchange with American Farriers Journal, APHIS consistently demonstrated a lack of comprehension regarding equine industry terminology. When an official was asked whether pads would be banned in Saddlebred-related events. The answer?

“The Horse Protection Act only applies to those horses that perform with an accentuated gait,” wrote Tanya Espinosa, an APHIS public affairs specialist.

When it was pointed out that pads have a legitimate therapeutic use, APHIS was asked what considerations were made for breeds and disciplines that aren’t traditionally associated with soring, a familiar answer was given.

“The Horse Protection Act only applies to those horses that perform with an accentuated gait,” Espinosa wrote.

APHIS describes pads as weights and a means of concealing objects used to produce force and pain. Is it APHIS’ understanding that this is the only role that pads play?

“When the HPA regulations were created in 1970, APHIS decided to allow [the] industry to retain the use of certain equipment and training devices, noting at the time that if the horse industry failed to establish a regulatory program to eliminate soring, APHIS would consider prohibiting all action devices and pads at a later time,” Espinosa wrote. “Nearly 40 years later, the horse industry has not eliminated soring, [and the] industry acknowledges that soring remains a problem. APHIS’ direct observations indicate that the use of action devices and pads frequently coincides with instances of soring and that their use can cause a horse to be sored. APHIS is proposing to make these illegal since pads may contain illegal objects designed to place pressure on the bottom of the horse’s foot. This is done to force the horse to lift their foot higher, as it is painful to step on. The majority of HPA noncompliance that APHIS detects involves horses that wear action devices and pads.”

It's a curious response that conjures the proverbial image of throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

To rectify the ambiguity and avoid unintended consequences — such as prohibiting the use of therapeutic pads for horses that suffer from bruising — the AHC, AAPF and the American Saddlebred Horse Association urge APHIS to limit all HPA changes to Tennessee Walking Horses, Racking Horses and Spotted Saddle Horses.

“Soring is a problem that is well defined and limited to a very specific segment of the horse industry; however, as written, the proposed rule is unclear regarding exactly which breeds or disciplines the USDA plans to extend the proposed ban on actions, practices, devices, and substances,” Broadway wrote. “This is unacceptable to the horse industry and must be clarified.

”In a letter to Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, 181 members of Congress expressed the same position. “Naming these three breeds,” according to the letter, “is vital to ensure the wider horse industry is not adversely impacted by the new regulations or new regulatory burdens are not inadvertently placed on breeds and disciplines that have no history of soring.” Time is of the essence. The nation elects its next president Tuesday. The transition of power takes place at noon Jan. 20, 2017. While APHIS has not set a timetable for a decision, there’s a possibility that the work and expense invested into this effort could be pushed aside by the next administration. With the Prevent All Soring Tactics Act (HR 3268/S. 1121) stalling for the second consecutive session on Capitol Hill, it’s an outcome that these members of Congress do not want to see again.

“[We] urge the USDA,” the bipartisan letter states, “to act expeditiously to finalize it before the end of this administration.

”And now we wait. 





The public comment period for the proposed amendments to the Horse Protection Act has come and gone. All parties within the horse industry have had a chance to let their voices be heard. Now, the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has the unenviable task of sorting through thousands upon thousands of comments and determine which recommendations have merit. Transcripts from the five public meetings, as well as submitted comments are available online. While the vast majority rightfully applauds the intent to end soring, there is a great deal of thoughtful insight and recommendations for change that APHIS seriously should consider. Much of the dissention focuses on two important areas — the broad language contained within the plan, as well as the proposed ban on “the use of all action devices, pads, and foreign substances at horse shows, exhibitions, sales, and auctions.” APHIS contends “this would align the HPA regulations with existing equestrian standards set forth by the U.S. Equestrian Federation (USEF).” 
Yet, according to its comments at the Sept. 6 public meeting in Riverdale, Md., USEF doesn’t seem to agree. “We believe that unless the proposed language is amended, the enforceability of the regulation is vulnerable to a court finding that the proposed rule is arbitrary and capricious,” said Stephen Schumacher, a veterinarian and the chief administrator of USEF’s Drugs and Medications Program. USEF and others in the equine industry — including the American Farrier’s Association and the American and International Associations of Professional Farriers — particularly are concerned with the statement “Tennessee Walking Horses, Racking Horses, or related breeds that perform with an accentuated gait that raises concerns about soring at any horse show, horse exhibition, horse sale, or horse auction.” “This term is ambiguous at best and risks severe unintended consequences in interpretation,” Schumacher said. “The rules in the proposed regulation simply don’t make sense for many breeds and disciplines where soring doesn’t exist. Our solution is simple. We propose that the breeds competing in USEF licensed/endorsed competitions be exempt from this regulation and the responsibility for preventing soring be delegated to the USEF as is the current practice.” The ambiguity drew a strong response from the American Horse Council, which called the provision “poorly constructed.” “There are several horse breeds besides Tennessee Walking Horses, Racking Horses, and Spotted Saddle Horses that could be said to have an ‘accentuated gait,’ such as Saddlebreds, Morgans, Hackneys, and others,” according to the letter attributed to Julie Broadway, president of the AHC. “These breeds have never been cited for violations of the HPA and do not perform the ‘big lick’ that is the primary motivation for soring. … [B]ecause the term ‘raises concerns about soring,’ is subjective and undefined, it is unclear whether or not these new provisions of the rule might be extended to such breeds now or in the future.” Some within the horse industry, including farriers, don’t believe that these concerns have merit. The government wouldn’t go to these extremes, they say. However, it cannot be assumed that those outside the industry correctly understand the terminology. In an email exchange with American Farriers Journal, APHIS consistently demonstrated a lack of comprehension regarding equine industry terminology. When an official was asked whether pads would be banned in Saddlebred-related events. The answer? “The Horse Protection Act only applies to those horses that perform with an accentuated gait,” wrote Tanya Espinosa, an APHIS public affairs specialist. When it was pointed out that pads have a legitimate therapeutic use, APHIS was asked what considerations were made for breeds and disciplines that aren’t traditionally associated with soring, a familiar answer was given. “The Horse Protection Act only applies to those horses that perform with an accentuated gait,” Espinosa wrote. APHIS describes pads as weights and a means of concealing objects used to produce force and pain. Is it APHIS’ understanding that this is the only role that pads play? “When the HPA regulations were created in 1970, APHIS decided to allow [the] industry to retain the use of certain equipment and training devices, noting at the time that if the horse industry failed to establish a regulatory program to eliminate soring, APHIS would consider prohibiting all action devices and pads at a later time,” Espinosa wrote. “Nearly 40 years later, the horse industry has not eliminated soring, [and the] industry acknowledges that soring remains a problem. APHIS’ direct observations indicate that the use of action devices and pads frequently coincides with instances of soring and that their use can cause a horse to be sored. APHIS is proposing to make these illegal since pads may contain illegal objects designed to place pressure on the bottom of the horse’s foot. This is done to force the horse to lift their foot higher, as it is painful to step on. The majority of HPA noncompliance that APHIS detects involves horses that wear action devices and pads.” It's a curious response that conjures the proverbial image of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. To rectify the ambiguity and avoid unintended consequences — such as prohibiting the use of therapeutic pads for horses that suffer from bruising — the AHC, AAPF and the American Saddlebred Horse Association urge APHIS to limit all HPA changes to Tennessee Walking Horses, Racking Horses and Spotted Saddle Horses. “Soring is a problem that is well defined and limited to a very specific segment of the horse industry; however, as written, the proposed rule is unclear regarding exactly which breeds or disciplines the USDA plans to extend the proposed ban on actions, practices, devices, and substances,” Broadway wrote. “This is unacceptable to the horse industry and must be clarified.” In a letter to Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, 181 members of Congress expressed the same position. “Naming these three breeds,” according to the letter, “is vital to ensure the wider horse industry is not adversely impacted by the new regulations or new regulatory burdens are not inadvertently placed on breeds and disciplines that have no history of soring.” Time is of the essence. The nation elects its next president Tuesday. The transition of power takes place at noon Jan. 20, 2017. While APHIS has not set a timetable for a decision, there’s a possibility that the work and expense invested into this effort could be pushed aside by the next administration. With the Prevent All Soring Tactics Act (HR 3268/S. 1121) stalling for the second consecutive session on Capitol Hill, it’s an outcome that these members of Congress do not want to see again. “[We] urge the USDA,” the bipartisan letter states, “to act expeditiously to finalize it before the end of this administration.” And now we wait. 

The public comment period for the proposed amendments to the Horse Protection Act has come and gone. All parties within the horse industry have had a chance to let their voices be heard. Now, the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has the unenviable task of sorting through thousands upon thousands of comments and determine which recommendations have merit. Transcripts from the five public meetings, as well as submitted comments are available online. While the vast majority rightfully applauds the intent to end soring, there is a great deal of thoughtful insight and recommendations for change that APHIS seriously should consider. Much of the dissention focuses on two important areas — the broad language contained within the plan, as well as the proposed ban on “the use of all action devices, pads, and foreign substances at horse shows, exhibitions, sales, and auctions.” APHIS contends “this would align the HPA regulations with existing equestrian standards set forth by the U.S. Equestrian Federation (USEF).” 
Yet, according to its comments at the Sept. 6 public meeting in Riverdale, Md., USEF doesn’t seem to agree. “We believe that unless the proposed language is amended, the enforceability of the regulation is vulnerable to a court finding that the proposed rule is arbitrary and capricious,” said Stephen Schumacher, a veterinarian and the chief administrator of USEF’s Drugs and Medications Program. USEF and others in the equine industry — including the American Farrier’s Association and the American and International Associations of Professional Farriers — particularly are concerned with the statement “Tennessee Walking Horses, Racking Horses, or related breeds that perform with an accentuated gait that raises concerns about soring at any horse show, horse exhibition, horse sale, or horse auction.” “This term is ambiguous at best and risks severe unintended consequences in interpretation,” Schumacher said. “The rules in the proposed regulation simply don’t make sense for many breeds and disciplines where soring doesn’t exist. Our solution is simple. We propose that the breeds competing in USEF licensed/endorsed competitions be exempt from this regulation and the responsibility for preventing soring be delegated to the USEF as is the current practice.” The ambiguity drew a strong response from the American Horse Council, which called the provision “poorly constructed.” “There are several horse breeds besides Tennessee Walking Horses, Racking Horses, and Spotted Saddle Horses that could be said to have an ‘accentuated gait,’ such as Saddlebreds, Morgans, Hackneys, and others,” according to the letter attributed to Julie Broadway, president of the AHC. “These breeds have never been cited for violations of the HPA and do not perform the ‘big lick’ that is the primary motivation for soring. … [B]ecause the term ‘raises concerns about soring,’ is subjective and undefined, it is unclear whether or not these new provisions of the rule might be extended to such breeds now or in the future.” Some within the horse industry, including farriers, don’t believe that these concerns have merit. The government wouldn’t go to these extremes, they say. However, it cannot be assumed that those outside the industry correctly understand the terminology. In an email exchange with American Farriers Journal, APHIS consistently demonstrated a lack of comprehension regarding equine industry terminology. When an official was asked whether pads would be banned in Saddlebred-related events. The answer? “The Horse Protection Act only applies to those horses that perform with an accentuated gait,” wrote Tanya Espinosa, an APHIS public affairs specialist. When it was pointed out that pads have a legitimate therapeutic use, APHIS was asked what considerations were made for breeds and disciplines that aren’t traditionally associated with soring, a familiar answer was given. “The Horse Protection Act only applies to those horses that perform with an accentuated gait,” Espinosa wrote. APHIS describes pads as weights and a means of concealing objects used to produce force and pain. Is it APHIS’ understanding that this is the only role that pads play? “When the HPA regulations were created in 1970, APHIS decided to allow [the] industry to retain the use of certain equipment and training devices, noting at the time that if the horse industry failed to establish a regulatory program to eliminate soring, APHIS would consider prohibiting all action devices and pads at a later time,” Espinosa wrote. “Nearly 40 years later, the horse industry has not eliminated soring, [and the] industry acknowledges that soring remains a problem. APHIS’ direct observations indicate that the use of action devices and pads frequently coincides with instances of soring and that their use can cause a horse to be sored. APHIS is proposing to make these illegal since pads may contain illegal objects designed to place pressure on the bottom of the horse’s foot. This is done to force the horse to lift their foot higher, as it is painful to step on. The majority of HPA noncompliance that APHIS detects involves horses that wear action devices and pads.” It's a curious response that conjures the proverbial image of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. To rectify the ambiguity and avoid unintended consequences — such as prohibiting the use of therapeutic pads for horses that suffer from bruising — the AHC, AAPF and the American Saddlebred Horse Association urge APHIS to limit all HPA changes to Tennessee Walking Horses, Racking Horses and Spotted Saddle Horses. “Soring is a problem that is well defined and limited to a very specific segment of the horse industry; however, as written, the proposed rule is unclear regarding exactly which breeds or disciplines the USDA plans to extend the proposed ban on actions, practices, devices, and substances,” Broadway wrote. “This is unacceptable to the horse industry and must be clarified.” In a letter to Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, 181 members of Congress expressed the same position. “Naming these three breeds,” according to the letter, “is vital to ensure the wider horse industry is not adversely impacted by the new regulations or new regulatory burdens are not inadvertently placed on breeds and disciplines that have no history of soring.” Time is of the essence. The nation elects its next president Tuesday. The transition of power takes place at noon Jan. 20, 2017. While APHIS has not set a timetable for a decision, there’s a possibility that the work and expense invested into this effort could be pushed aside by the next administration. With the Prevent All Soring Tactics Act (HR 3268/S. 1121) stalling for the second consecutive session on Capitol Hill, it’s an outcome that these members of Congress do not want to see again. “[We] urge the USDA,” the bipartisan letter states, “to act expeditiously to finalize it before the end of this administration.” And now we wait. 


The public comment period for the proposed amendments to the Horse Protection Act has come and gone. All parties within the horse industry have had a chance to let their voices be heard. Now, the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) has the unenviable task of sorting through thousands upon thousands of comments and determine which recommendations have merit. Transcripts from the five public meetings, as well as submitted comments are available online. While the vast majority rightfully applauds the intent to end soring, there is a great deal of thoughtful insight and recommendations for change that APHIS seriously should consider. Much of the dissention focuses on two important areas — the broad language contained within the plan, as well as the proposed ban on “the use of all action devices, pads, and foreign substances at horse shows, exhibitions, sales, and auctions.” APHIS contends “this would align the HPA regulations with existing equestrian standards set forth by the U.S. Equestrian Federation (USEF).” 
Yet, according to its comments at the Sept. 6 public meeting in Riverdale, Md., USEF doesn’t seem to agree. “We believe that unless the proposed language is amended, the enforceability of the regulation is vulnerable to a court finding that the proposed rule is arbitrary and capricious,” said Stephen Schumacher, a veterinarian and the chief administrator of USEF’s Drugs and Medications Program. USEF and others in the equine industry — including the American Farrier’s Association and the American and International Associations of Professional Farriers — particularly are concerned with the statement “Tennessee Walking Horses, Racking Horses, or related breeds that perform with an accentuated gait that raises concerns about soring at any horse show, horse exhibition, horse sale, or horse auction.” “This term is ambiguous at best and risks severe unintended consequences in interpretation,” Schumacher said. “The rules in the proposed regulation simply don’t make sense for many breeds and disciplines where soring doesn’t exist. Our solution is simple. We propose that the breeds competing in USEF licensed/endorsed competitions be exempt from this regulation and the responsibility for preventing soring be delegated to the USEF as is the current practice.” The ambiguity drew a strong response from the American Horse Council, which called the provision “poorly constructed.” “There are several horse breeds besides Tennessee Walking Horses, Racking Horses, and Spotted Saddle Horses that could be said to have an ‘accentuated gait,’ such as Saddlebreds, Morgans, Hackneys, and others,” according to the letter attributed to Julie Broadway, president of the AHC. “These breeds have never been cited for violations of the HPA and do not perform the ‘big lick’ that is the primary motivation for soring. … [B]ecause the term ‘raises concerns about soring,’ is subjective and undefined, it is unclear whether or not these new provisions of the rule might be extended to such breeds now or in the future.” Some within the horse industry, including farriers, don’t believe that these concerns have merit. The government wouldn’t go to these extremes, they say. However, it cannot be assumed that those outside the industry correctly understand the terminology. In an email exchange with American Farriers Journal, APHIS consistently demonstrated a lack of comprehension regarding equine industry terminology. When an official was asked whether pads would be banned in Saddlebred-related events. The answer? “The Horse Protection Act only applies to those horses that perform with an accentuated gait,” wrote Tanya Espinosa, an APHIS public affairs specialist. When it was pointed out that pads have a legitimate therapeutic use, APHIS was asked what considerations were made for breeds and disciplines that aren’t traditionally associated with soring, a familiar answer was given. “The Horse Protection Act only applies to those horses that perform with an accentuated gait,” Espinosa wrote. APHIS describes pads as weights and a means of concealing objects used to produce force and pain. Is it APHIS’ understanding that this is the only role that pads play? “When the HPA regulations were created in 1970, APHIS decided to allow [the] industry to retain the use of certain equipment and training devices, noting at the time that if the horse industry failed to establish a regulatory program to eliminate soring, APHIS would consider prohibiting all action devices and pads at a later time,” Espinosa wrote. “Nearly 40 years later, the horse industry has not eliminated soring, [and the] industry acknowledges that soring remains a problem. APHIS’ direct observations indicate that the use of action devices and pads frequently coincides with instances of soring and that their use can cause a horse to be sored. APHIS is proposing to make these illegal since pads may contain illegal objects designed to place pressure on the bottom of the horse’s foot. This is done to force the horse to lift their foot higher, as it is painful to step on. The majority of HPA noncompliance that APHIS detects involves horses that wear action devices and pads.” It's a curious response that conjures the proverbial image of throwing the baby out with the bathwater. To rectify the ambiguity and avoid unintended consequences — such as prohibiting the use of therapeutic pads for horses that suffer from bruising — the AHC, AAPF and the American Saddlebred Horse Association urge APHIS to limit all HPA changes to Tennessee Walking Horses, Racking Horses and Spotted Saddle Horses. “Soring is a problem that is well defined and limited to a very specific segment of the horse industry; however, as written, the proposed rule is unclear regarding exactly which breeds or disciplines the USDA plans to extend the proposed ban on actions, practices, devices, and substances,” Broadway wrote. “This is unacceptable to the horse industry and must be clarified.” In a letter to Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, 181 members of Congress expressed the same position. “Naming these three breeds,” according to the letter, “is vital to ensure the wider horse industry is not adversely impacted by the new regulations or new regulatory burdens are not inadvertently placed on breeds and disciplines that have no history of soring.” Time is of the essence. The nation elects its next president Tuesday. The transition of power takes place at noon Jan. 20, 2017. While APHIS has not set a timetable for a decision, there’s a possibility that the work and expense invested into this effort could be pushed aside by the next administration. With the Prevent All Soring Tactics Act (HR 3268/S. 1121) stalling for the second consecutive session on Capitol Hill, it’s an outcome that these members of Congress do not want to see again. “[We] urge the USDA,” the bipartisan letter states, “to act expeditiously to finalize it before the end of this administration.” And now we wait. 

More Stories

  • Latest Issue 12 7 20

    Read More
  • Obituary – Rusty Hyneman

    The Report has recently learned of the passing of Rusty Hyneman, following a battle with cancer.A full obituary will be posted as it becomes available. Our thoughts and prayers go out to the Hyneman family during this difficult time.  Read More
  • WHTA Board of Directors and General Membership Meeting

    The Walking Horse Trainers' Association Board of Directors and General Membership meeting will be held December 11, 2020 at the Blue Ribbon Circle Club on the Celebration Grounds... Read More
  • WHAA to host annual awards banquet

    The WHAA Annual Awards Banquet will be held on Saturday, January 30, at 5:00 pm at Stone Bridge Farms in the Browne Stone Centre, 281 County Road 717, Cullman, AL 35055. Read More
  • Happy Holidays!

    I don’t know about the rest of you but I am definitely ready for this year to end! What started as so normal couldn’t have ended any differently. I would venture to guess that for most of us this is the craziest time we have experienced in our lives... Read More
  • TWHBEA postpones election until February 6th

    The executive committee of the Tennessee Walking Horse Breeders’ & Exhibitors’ Association (TWHBEA) met yesterday and made the decision to postpone the elections for the new executive committee until February 6, 2021... Read More
  • Kentucky After Christmas Sale postpones until 2022

    Due to circumstances and restrictions around the Covid-19 pandemic, the Kentucky After Christmas Sale will cancel its 2021 sale and look forward to continuing its tradition in 2022. The sale will be on the weekend of Saturday February 5, 2022 at the Kentucky Horse Park in Lexington, Kentucky. Read More
  • USDA declines use of new pad material

    Earlier this show season the Walking Horse Trainers’ Association (WHTA) petitioned the USDA to allow use of a new pad material.  The new material was a “compressed rubber” material and as such was thought to be allowed under current regulations. Read More
  • 2020 Readers' Choice Ballot

    You don't have to be a member of anything to vote for your favorite horses, exhibitors, trainers and shows in The 39th Annual Walking Horse Report Readers' Choice conducted by The Walking Horse Report... Read More
  • Celebration forms committee to help with class sheet

    The Tennessee Walking Horse National Celebration (TWHNC) hosted the first meeting of its newly formed class sheet committee on November 23, 2020. The committee consists of Nathan Clark, Justin Jenne, Jennifer Bingham, Laurie Toone, Howard Hamilton and Amy Trimble. Read More